This is a very ominous analysis of the Chief’s concurring opinion in reversing the rogue 5th Circuit in the LA case decided Monday. While concurring with the majority in striking down the LA statute, the Chief relied on the issue of precedent, he did not agree with the majority on the weighing standard set forth in Casey that was used to reverse the Texas statute. IOW, there are not 5 votes to uphold Roe or Casey.
– shared via Facebook, see original here: